Executive Guardian
Your organization’s leadership is 12 times more likely to be the target of a security incident and nine times more likely to be the target of a data breach than they were last year. Find out how they can be protected.
Read the Datasheet
Gift Cardsharks: The Massive Threat Campaigns Circling Beneath the Surface
Learn about the attack group primarily targeting gift card retailers and the monetization techniques they use.
Get the Report
Threat Hunting Workshop Series
Join one of our security threat hunting workshops to get hands-on experience investigating and remediating threats.
Attend an Upcoming Workshop
Inside Magecart: New RiskIQ & Flashpoint Research Report
Learn about the groups and criminal underworld behind the front-page breaches.
Threat Hunting Guide: 3 Must-Haves for the Effective Modern Threat Hunter
The threat hunting landscape is constantly evolving. Learn the techniques, tactics, and tools needed to become a highly-effective threat hunter.
This Valentine’s Day, think twice—you may be downloading a malicious dating app.
Nothing gives singles a painful reminder of their loneliness quite like Valentine’s Day. The approach of February 14th causes a recurring seasonal spike in the availability and downloads of legitimate, illegitimate, and malicious mobile apps related to romance and dating. According to marketing data intelligence firm AppAnnie, dating apps currently comprise 14 of the top-25 grossing lifestyle apps and two of the top-25 grossing overall apps.
Unfortunately, this predictably frenetic February dating app activity plays right into the hands of cyber threat groups and individuals looking to take advantage of heartache-induced lapses of judgment. These threat actors will leverage popular keywords and branding of well-known dating apps to trick people into downloading their fake and malicious apps, which can steal sensitive information, redirect traffic to malicious pages, and infect devices with malware.
To combat this problem, RiskIQ applies its crawling platform to monitor 120+ mobile application stores and the nearly 2 billion resources we scan daily to look for mobile apps in the wild. With this proactive store-first scanning mentality, we observe and categorize the threat landscape as a user visiting app stores and downloading applications would. Every app we encounter is downloaded, detonated, analyzed, and stored to build a repository of over 14,000,000 mobile apps.
For our 2017 Valentine’s Day dating app research, we queried this data repository to find apps utilizing the names of seven of the most popular dating apps in the United States:
We found hundreds of mentions of these seven brands in apps and app stores around the world. While not all of the apps listed in Fig-1 are harmful to users, the vast majority of them have nothing to do with the brands they’re leveraging. Because these brands have no control over the content of the apps using their names, this (often fraudulent) activity can result in false brand association and the degradation of trust with consumers.
Totals of Active and Inactive Apps Found by RiskIQ (Fig-1)
Although not all the apps we found are directly harmful to end-users, many are extremely dangerous and have been blacklisted by RiskIQ as a result. These malicious dating apps were built to be used for phishing, distributing malware, or redirecting users to malicious pages:
Amount of Active and Inactive Malicious Apps Blacklisted by RiskIQ (Fig-2)
The global app ecosystem is a wild and unruly place, and not all bad apps have been blacklisted. One tell-tale sign of a malicious app is if it asks for excessive permissions or permissions that aren’t consistent with the promised function of the app. In 2017, RiskIQ found that the top-20 permissions used by both legitimate and blacklisted applications remained roughly the same as years past. This consistency shows that malicious apps are using the same behaviors as legitimate ones, only for nefarious ends.
Many of the apps in fig-1 asked for permissions that are unusual for a dating app, such as access to premium SMS and recording audio and video:
Permissions for Each App (Fig-3)
This Valentine’s Day, we know threat actors are taking aim at victims looking to download romance and dating-related apps. By following these steps, you can save yourself from a broken heart:
Users should make sure the things an app is requesting the capability to do matches up with what they expect it to do—malicious apps are much more likely to ask for vast swathes of extra permissions, well beyond what their core function would suggest they need. These might include the subtly suspicious permissions in Fig-3 above, or some that are completely out of the ordinary, such as being able to wipe a phone back to factory settings.
Just because an app appears to have a good reputation doesn’t make it so. Rave reviews can be forged, and a high amount of downloads can simply indicate a threat actor was successful in fooling a lot of victims. Before downloading an app, be sure to take a look at the developer—if it’s not a brand you recognize or has a strange appearance or spelling, think twice. You can even do a Google search on the developer for more clues about its reputation.
Fig-4 This app blacklisted by RiskIQ has over 18,837 downloads
RiskIQ research found that Q4 2016 brought with it a host of new malicious applications, as well as the stores to serve them, a trend we expect will continue in 2017. Cyber threat actors are starting to move away from legitimate stores such as the Apple App Store and Google Play, focusing more on feral applications and secondary hosting providers.
For example, one of the newly added stores, AllFreeAPK, shot immediately into our list of top 10 all-time providers of blacklisted applications within the first few months of being tracked.
Fig-5 Examples of malicious “Tinder” apps in the AllFreeAPK store
This Valentine’s Day, make sure to take a deeper look at each app. New developers, or those that take advantage free email services (@gmail) for their developer contact, can be huge red flags—threat actors often use them to produce mass amounts of malicious apps in a short period. Also, bad grammar in the description highlights the haste of development and the lack of marketing professionalism that are hallmarks of mobile malware campaigns.
Fig-6 This dating app leveraging a URL linking to OkCupid in the description does not quite sound like it was created by a professional…
RiskIQ differs from other monitoring systems that rely on end users employing their virus scanning tools and manual sample submissions. RiskIQ Mobile Threats provides discovery across all major app stores as well as more than 150 less common stores, including focused coverage of high-risk stores and regions for brand impersonation, malware, and fraud. In addition to unparalleled coverage of third-party app stores worldwide, RiskIQ incorporates a unique source of “feral app” binaries, or mobile apps collected outside of dedicated mobile app stores, via drive-by download for example. With this comprehensive mobile presence knowledge organizations have the unparalleled ability to:
To analyze the methods threat actors will employ this Valentine’s Day and where they’re targeting their malicious efforts, RiskIQ ran a keyword query of the mobile app database* looking for instances of the brand names of seven leading dating apps in the United States.
The findings confirmed that threat actors are using these well-known dating apps specifically to exploit their popularity.
*The source of RiskIQ’s Blacklists is our collection of internet data, which our collection architecture of virtual users gathers by scanning, crawling, and passive-sensing the internet—including web pages, mobile apps and stores, and a variety of social websites and apps. RiskIQ’s crawling technology covers more than 300 million mobile devices, 1.8 billion HTTP sessions, 783 global locations across more than 100 countries, 16 million mobile apps, and 300 million domain records.
RiskIQFollow
Apple disputes Google's accuracy on recent iOS hacks, and they may be right -agree with Apple on this one -also think Apple was wrong for not notifying users back when it learned of the attacks -features some insight from @ydklijnsma https://t.co/N3DISYqEdT
RiskIQ's @flibeau comments on how a ‘one for all’ #cybersecurity approach is needed to prevent the spread of #malvertising via @SCmagazineUK, in light of the observation of a series of attacks on WordPress sites using rogue admin accounts https://t.co/qp7aYweZC1
We are delighted to be named a finalist in the Computing Security Awards ‘Enterprise Security Solution of the Year’ category. Show your support by voting for us here @CSMagAndAwards https://t.co/rUETN4xPcA
Pumped to be presenting at #VB2019! I'll be: - Giving an update on the previously disclosed groups - Updates on TTP since the early report - New developments in skimmer "technology" - Interesting new players who joined the game - Undisclosed supply-chain attacks we observed https://t.co/MVkxZlnBUe
@cyberdefensemag Publisher @miliefsky Sharing an important story about Trump’s Cyber security Executive Order #cybersecurity #CYBER #SECURITY in this #CDM #EXCLUSIVE https://t.co/ztcs593TuM by Lou Manousos @RiskIQ who we hope to see @IPEXPO #CDM